Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement Pdf

On 22 February 2012, the European Commission asked the Court of Justice to check whether the ACAC agreement violated the fundamental rights of the European Union and the eu`s fundamental freedoms,[66] delaying the EU ratification process. [67] However, the InTA, the European Parliament`s Committee on International Trade, decided, in view of its exclusion from the negotiations, the secrecy of the negotiations and the recent protests, to hold its vote on ratification as planned in June or July 2012, despite the objections of the European Commission. [68] ACTA establishes the ACTA Committee in Article 36 as a separate governing body outside existing international institutions, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) or the United Nations. [26] [84] Regarding the reason for not pursuing ACTA on the G8, WTO, WIPO or other existing formal structures, the European Commission states that an independent agreement offers the greatest flexibility to “continue this project among the countries concerned”, while stating that “the accession and priorities of these organisations (G8, WTO and OMPO) are simply not the most conducive to this type of rupture.” [26] The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACAC) was a multilateral treaty establishing international standards for the application of intellectual property rights. The agreement aims to create an international legal framework for combating counterfeiting, generic medicines and copyright infringement on the internet and would create a new governing body outside existing forums, such as the World Trade Organization, the World Intellectual Property Organization and the United Nations. Even if a country is not involved in the ACTA negotiations, it is likely that country membership and implementation of its provisions will be a condition imposed in future free trade agreements and will be evaluated in content industry submissions to The Special Annual Report 301. Ultimately, it will limit the ability of nations to choose policy options that best align with their domestic policy priorities and level of economic development. Slovenia`s Ambassador to Japan, Helena Drnovék-Zorko, issued a statement on 31 January 2012, expressing her deep contrition for the signing of the agreement. “I signed ACTA out of civic inattention because I wasn`t reluctant enough. Quite simply, I have not clearly linked the agreement I had instructed to sign to the agreement which, according to my own bourgeois conviction, restricts and retains freedom of engagement in the largest and most important network in human history, in particular limiting the future of our children,” she said. [81] [150] It was agreed in the opinion that the reduction of counterfeiting is significant when it endangers the health or safety of consumers or constitutes a violation of the commercial scale. However, the coalition insisted that the pursuit of this objective would not jeopardize legitimate commercial, social, innovative and creative activities, consumer rights or the free flow of information.

The coalition noted that the current draft treaty raised serious concerns about transparency, increased powers over customs police, increased penalties for breaches of mental protection procedures and the lack of adequate procedures.

Comments are closed.